Anniversary of Dobbs Decision | Left-Leaning Bias

U.S. Media

•

30 days

Summary

sources
97
Narrative Items
267
Bottom Line Up Front

97 sources in U.S. Media are amplifying 267 narrative items relating to the narrative of increasing criminalization of pregnancy and reproductive rights post-Dobbs. These narratives connect themes of systemic injustice, particularly against marginalized communities, the dangers of restrictive laws, and the erosion of personal liberties, highlighting the urgent need for equitable healthcare access.

Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that different media sources portray these events through distinct lenses, often highlighting varying aspects of the broader narrative surrounding reproductive rights. Time Magazine presents a bleak picture of the rise in pregnancy criminalization, using emotionally charged phrases such as "driving them away from healthcare," which suggests a concern for women's welfare but could evoke fear. In contrast, The Atlantic focuses on the personal tragedy of Amber Thurman's death, framing it as an illustration of the failures of restrictive laws, thus portraying abortion bans in a highly negative light. New Republic emphasizes the implications of the Dobbs decision on personal liberties, indicating a broader threat to rights, while employing sober language reflecting a serious warning without overt sensationalism. Salon and Raw Story take a more combative approach, with Salon criticizing Trump's remarks on critics of the Supreme Court, labeling them as "deeply anti-American," which could be seen as a form of propaganda to galvanize opposition. Drudge Retort mirrors this sentiment by highlighting the loss of public trust in the Supreme Court, while Crooks and Liars illustrates outrage over Trump’s comments—both sources focusing on political fallout rather than individual suffering. Finally, Rolling Stone and Counter Punch analyze the Supreme Court's decisions in a critical light, suggesting ideological bias that undermines the court's legitimacy. The main differences lie in the emotional weight and perspectives emphasized—whether personal stories, political critiques, or systemic warnings—shaping the audience's interpretation of these significant social issues.

About This Module

The U.S. Media module tracks a broad range of American media sources, including major television, cable, print, and online organizations.

Read more...
Read Less...

Sources

Sources by Type
Sources of these types represent most of the amplification activity around this narrative
sources by Volume
These sources are amplifying the most items involved in this narrative. Click to see details of each source's narrative activity.
Top sources
Day-by-day volumetric activity of sources amplifying the most items around this narrative
Raw Story
6% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Mother Jones
6% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
The 19th News
5% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Ms. Magazine
4% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Pennsylvania Capital-Star
3% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
AlterNet
2% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Rewire News Group
2% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Rolling Stone
2% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Salon
2% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Daily Kos
2% of the narratives in this brief were amplified by this source.
Read more...
Read Less...

Top Items

These narrative items are the most relevant and/or the most amplified. Click to see details and suggested messages.
Amplifiers:
Time Magazine
time.com
The Rise of Pregnancy Criminalization Post-Dobbs
A new report by Pregnancy Justice reveals a surge in pregnancy criminalization cases post-Dobbs, with 210 charges filed in the first year. The majority of charges involve substance use during pregnancy, highlighting the dangers of criminalizing pregnant people and driving them away from healthcare. The report also found that pregnancy loss is increasingly treated as a suspicious event, with 22 cases of criminalization. While direct abortion criminalization is rare, the report warns that existing laws and the "fetal personhood" ideology are being used to prosecute pregnant people, particularly those from marginalized communities.
Amplifiers:
The Atlantic
theatlantic.com
The Women Killed by the Dobbs Decision
Amber Thurman, a Georgia woman, died after a botched abortion due to restrictive state laws enacted after Roe v. Wade was overturned. Doctors hesitated to provide life-saving care fearing legal repercussions. Thurman's death exemplifies the dangerous consequences of abortion bans, putting women at risk and causing preventable deaths. The case highlights the need for access to safe abortion care and challenges the pro-life stance by demonstrating the tragic reality of restrictive abortion laws.
Amplifiers:
New Republic
newrepublic.com
The Supreme Court May Use Dobbs to Take Down Trans Rights—and Beyond
The Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, could have far-reaching consequences beyond abortion, potentially jeopardizing transgender rights and other areas of personal liberty.
Amplifiers:
Salon
salon.com
New report shows more than 200 pregnant people have faced criminal charges since Dobbs decision
A new report shows a surge in criminal charges against pregnant people since Roe v. Wade was overturned, with 210 cases documented in the past year. These charges, often for child abuse or neglect, are frequently brought even without evidence of harm to the fetus, raising concerns about increased surveillance and criminalization of pregnant people. The report highlights racial disparities, with Black and Indigenous mothers disproportionately affected by these prosecutions. Experts warn that the trend, linked to the war on drugs and stigmatized views of pregnant women, will likely continue with new restrictions on reproductive rights.
Amplifiers:
Raw Story
rawstory.com
'Deeply anti-American': Trump calls for jailing Supreme Court critics
Trump has been criticized for suggesting that critics of the Supreme Court, including those who oppose the overturning of Roe v. Wade, should be jailed. He has praised the judges who ruled against abortion rights, calling them "brave" while urging punishment for those who criticize them. His comments have been condemned as deeply anti-American and an attack on free speech.
Amplifiers:
Drudge Retort
drudge.com
Trust in U.S. Supreme Court Continues to Sink
Public trust in the U.S. Supreme Court has plummeted since the Dobbs decision, with over half of Americans now disapproving of the court due to concerns about political partisanship and the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The decline is attributed to the court's perceived lack of action in the best interest of the public.
Amplifiers:
Crooks and Liars
crooksandliars.com
On Howard Stern, Harris Focuses On SCOTUS
Vice President Harris warns Howard Stern that a Trump victory could lead to a Supreme Court further restricting rights, including same-sex marriage. She highlights the court's recent decisions on abortion and Trump's immunity, emphasizing the long-term impact of the next president's Supreme Court appointments. Harris also celebrates Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic confirmation as the first Black woman on the court.
Amplifiers:
The Christian Left
commondreams.org
'Deeply Anti-American': Trump Calls for Jailing Supreme Court Critics | Common Dreams
Trump called for jailing critics of Supreme Court justices, specifically those who speak out against the overturning of Roe v. Wade. He praised the justices who made the decision and suggested that criticism of them is illegal. This sparked outrage from Democrats and legal experts who condemned his comments as anti-American and an attack on free speech.
Amplifiers:
Rolling Stone
rollingstone.com
Supreme Court Lets Texas Ban Emergency Room Abortions
The Supreme Court has declined to hear a case challenging Texas' ban on emergency abortions, allowing the state to enforce its strict ban on abortion in virtually all cases. This decision, based on the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), could further endanger pregnant patients, as Texas already faces skyrocketing maternal and infant mortality rates since implementing the ban.
Amplifiers:
Counter Punch
counterpunch.org
Constitutional Precedent and Partisan Ideology in the Roberts Supreme Court
The Supreme Court's approval has declined under Chief Justice Roberts due to the perception that it prioritizes ideology over neutral legal principles. This is evident in the Court's rejection of constitutional precedent, particularly in cases involving abortion rights. Conservative justices, appointed by Republicans, are more likely to overturn precedent, suggesting partisanship influences their decisions. This ideological bias undermines the Court's legitimacy and threatens individual rights.
Read more...
Read Less...

Themes

Tap or click for details
These adjacent themes are currently being amplified along with the main narrative. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Ongoing special counsel prosecutions
The recent filing in Trump's Florida case highlights ongoing legal challenges related to special counsel prosecutions, with implications for future Supreme Court considerations.
Supreme Court Decision
The Dobbs decision, which removed access to abortion as a constitutionally protected right, is leading to increased support for legal abortion and reshaping the political landscape around this divisive issue.
Balancing state interests and women's rights
The ruling highlights that while the state has a compelling interest in protecting unborn life, women's rights take precedence until that life can be independently sustained.
Protecting in-vitro fertilization rights
Efforts to protect IVF rights for hardworking couples supported by bipartisan leaders like President Biden and former President Trump.
Maternal Mortality Case Review
Thurman's case is being reviewed by the maternal mortality commission, revealing concerns about hospital treatment delays for pregnant patients.
Conservative Influence on Supreme Court Decisions
Donald Trump and conservative interests achieved their goals in reshaping the Supreme Court this term, reflecting a deep ideological divide and concerns about judicial independence.
Read more...
Read Less...

Entities

Tap or click for details
These entities are mentioned most frequently in the narratives highlighted in this brief. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Miscellaneous
Fetal personhood ideology
A legal concept used to prosecute pregnant individuals.
War on drugs
A campaign that has influenced the criminalization of pregnant individuals.
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)
A federal law that the Supreme Court referenced in a recent abortion case.
Maternal and infant mortality rates
Statistics that have worsened in Texas since the implementation of strict abortion laws.
Political partisanship
The perceived bias in the U.S. Supreme Court affecting public trust.
Racial disparities in prosecutions
The unequal impact of pregnancy criminalization on Black and Indigenous mothers.
Events
Dobbs decision
The Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade.
Roe v. Wade
The landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion in the U.S.
Texas' ban on emergency abortions
A legal case regarding Texas' strict abortion laws.
Confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson
The historic confirmation of the first Black woman to the Supreme Court.
Surge in pregnancy criminalization cases
A report revealing an increase in criminal charges against pregnant individuals post-Dobbs.
Trump's comments on Supreme Court critics
Controversial remarks made by Donald Trump regarding critics of the Supreme Court.
People
Amber Thurman
A Georgia woman who died after a botched abortion due to restrictive state laws.
Vice President Harris
The Vice President of the United States who warns about the implications of a Trump victory on rights.
Ketanji Brown Jackson
The first Black woman confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Donald Trump
Former President of the United States who has made controversial comments regarding the Supreme Court.
Howard Stern
A media personality who interviewed Vice President Harris.
Chief Justice Roberts
The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Organizations
Pregnancy Justice
An organization that released a report on pregnancy criminalization cases.
U.S. Supreme Court
The highest court in the United States, involved in recent controversial decisions.
Miscellaneous
Fetal personhood ideology
A legal concept used to prosecute pregnant individuals.
War on drugs
A campaign that has influenced the criminalization of pregnant individuals.
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)
A federal law that the Supreme Court referenced in a recent abortion case.
Maternal and infant mortality rates
Statistics that have worsened in Texas since the implementation of strict abortion laws.
Political partisanship
The perceived bias in the U.S. Supreme Court affecting public trust.
Racial disparities in prosecutions
The unequal impact of pregnancy criminalization on Black and Indigenous mothers.
Events
Dobbs decision
The Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade.
Roe v. Wade
The landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion in the U.S.
Texas' ban on emergency abortions
A legal case regarding Texas' strict abortion laws.
Confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson
The historic confirmation of the first Black woman to the Supreme Court.
Surge in pregnancy criminalization cases
A report revealing an increase in criminal charges against pregnant individuals post-Dobbs.
Trump's comments on Supreme Court critics
Controversial remarks made by Donald Trump regarding critics of the Supreme Court.
People
Amber Thurman
A Georgia woman who died after a botched abortion due to restrictive state laws.
Vice President Harris
The Vice President of the United States who warns about the implications of a Trump victory on rights.
Ketanji Brown Jackson
The first Black woman confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Donald Trump
Former President of the United States who has made controversial comments regarding the Supreme Court.
Howard Stern
A media personality who interviewed Vice President Harris.
Chief Justice Roberts
The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Organizations
Pregnancy Justice
An organization that released a report on pregnancy criminalization cases.
U.S. Supreme Court
The highest court in the United States, involved in recent controversial decisions.

Context

The issues surrounding pregnancy criminalization and reproductive rights in the United States have significant demographic, social, economic, political, and military implications. The surge in criminal charges against pregnant individuals, particularly for substance use, reflects broader societal attitudes towards motherhood and health care. Marginalized communities, especially Black and Indigenous mothers, face disproportionate scrutiny and legal repercussions, exacerbating existing inequalities in healthcare access and social support systems.

The political landscape has shifted dramatically since the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, leading to increased restrictions on reproductive rights. This has raised concerns about the erosion of personal liberties, including potential threats to transgender rights and same-sex marriage. The Supreme Court's perceived partisanship and ideological bias have contributed to a decline in public trust, with many Americans feeling that the Court no longer acts in the public's best interest.

Geographically, states like Texas have implemented strict abortion bans, resulting in rising maternal and infant mortality rates. The legal environment creates a chilling effect on healthcare providers, who may hesitate to offer necessary care due to fear of legal repercussions. This situation poses a national security concern, as the health and well-being of the population are critical to societal stability.

The economic implications are also significant, as criminalizing pregnancy can deter individuals from seeking healthcare, leading to worse health outcomes and increased healthcare costs. The intertwining of legal, social, and economic factors highlights the urgent need for comprehensive policies that prioritize the health and rights of pregnant individuals, ensuring equitable access to care and protection from criminalization.
Read more...
Read Less...
World Events
Tap or roll over dots to see representative headlines
Stock & Crypto Dynamics