U.S. Media
•30 days
679 sources in U.S. Media are amplifying 8,100 narrative items relating to the narrative of climate accountability and activism. These narratives connect themes of legislative action against fossil fuel companies, the influence of fossil fuel funding in academia, and the urgent need for systemic change to address climate crises and public health impacts.
Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that Inside Climate News primarily portrays the events surrounding climate activism and accountability for fossil fuel companies in a critical light, emphasizing the urgency of these issues through the use of charged language and phrases that stress accountability and environmental justice. Their coverage is often laden with terms like "urgent push," "climate crimes," and "damage," which can evoke strong emotions. In contrast, Grist takes a more nuanced approach, providing detailed analyses of specific issues like moisture levels and flooding strategies, while highlighting the challenges that come with climate change. Their language tends to be more neutral, although they also discuss the dire consequences of inaction. Common Dreams echoes the alarmist tones found in Inside Climate News but centers more on the broader existential threats posed by climate crises, employing emotionally powerful rhetoric that can be perceived as biased. Truthout critiques spending habits and policy effectiveness with a more skeptical tone, indicating inefficacy without overly dramatizing the situation. Overall, while all these sources aim to highlight critical climate issues, their techniques—ranging from emotionally charged language to straightforward reporting—result in varying degrees of urgency and bias in their portrayals.
The U.S. Media module tracks a broad range of American media sources, including major television, cable, print, and online organizations.