Think Tanks
•7 days
65 sources in Think Tanks are amplifying 801 narrative items relating to the narrative of global instability and governance challenges. These narratives connect themes of geopolitical tensions, human rights violations, and environmental crises, illustrating how mismanagement and political deadlock exacerbate regional conflicts and undermine international cooperation, ultimately affecting global security and human welfare.
Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that the portrayal of these events varies widely among media sources, reflecting their underlying biases and objectives. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) presents a neutral analysis of US-Africa relations and China’s strategic goals, using academic language that examines complexities without eliciting strong emotional responses. Conversely, the Gatestone Institute paints a dramatic picture of Brussels’ crisis using loaded language, highlighting a city on the brink of collapse, which may amplify fears among its audience. Similarly, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow suggests government mismanagement behind wildfires, using hyperbole to assert that climate change arguments are a distraction from accountable governance, framing this narrative in a way that resonates with anti-regulatory sentiments. On a more humanitarian front, Human Rights Watch expresses a strongly negative view of Trump’s policies regarding human rights and immigration, employing emotionally charged language to invoke outrage and urgency over perceived injustices. In contrast, the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) critiques H.R. 29 by focusing on corporate benefits, effectively using persuasive language to mobilize opposition against the bill, suggesting an explicit agenda to safeguard immigrant rights. Each source not only conveys its perspective through selective language and focus but also aims to engage its audience in ways that reflect their unique missions and values.
The Think Tanks module tracks a large number of policy institutes, research organizations, and advocacy groups from a wide range of areas such as economics, social issues, military, and science and technology.