AUKUS

Pacific Region Media

•

30 days

Summary

sources
29
Narrative Items
93
Bottom Line Up Front

29 sources in Pacific Region Media are amplifying 93 narrative items relating to the narrative of the AUKUS agreement. These narratives highlight concerns about mismanagement and delays, emphasizing how the pact primarily serves US and UK interests while leaving Australia vulnerable. Despite bipartisan support in the US, skepticism about AUKUS's benefits for Australia persists.

Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that media coverage of the AUKUS agreement is deeply polarized. Independent Australia takes a negative stance, criticizing the mismanagement and fabricated fears driving the pact, suggesting this benefits the US and UK militaries at Australia's expense, using emotionally charged phrases like "vulnerable" and "financially burdened." In contrast, Perth Now adopts a more positive outlook, emphasizing the strong bipartisan support in Congress for AUKUS, which reassures readers about the stability of submarine supply to Australia. Similarly, outlets such as Australian National Review and The Age News highlight the agreement's importance in countering China's aggression, framing Australia as a strategic player in the Asia-Pacific, with reassuring language that downplays concerns about potential political shifts in the US. In a similar vein, Brisbane Times, WA Today, and Sydney Morning Herald reflect on US officials' perspectives affirming AUKUS's critical role while emphasizing a long-term strategic vision. Meanwhile, reports from The Straits Times and Frontier Post Pakistan focus on the concept of "burden-sharing," positively linking Australia’s investment to strengthening US deterrence, while still hinting at how this aligns with former President Trump’s rhetoric. The contrasting portrayals highlight a significant divide between those who perceive AUKUS as a beneficial ally-based initiative and those who see it as a costly dependency driven by external interests.

About This Module

The Pacific Region Media module tracks a large number of news organizations and journalists operating in, and reporting on, the Indo-Pacific region.

Read more...
Read Less...

Sources

Sources by Type
Sources of these types represent most of the amplification activity around this narrative
sources by Volume
These sources are amplifying the most items involved in this narrative. Click to see details of each source's narrative activity.
Top sources
Day-by-day volumetric activity of sources amplifying the most items around this narrative
The Age News
12% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Brisbane Times
12% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
WA Today
12% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
The Sydney Morning Herald
11% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
The Diplomat
6% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Perth Now
5% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
The Frontier Post Pakistan
4% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Australian National Review
4% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Independent Australia
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
South China Morning Post
2% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Read more...
Read Less...

Top Items

These narrative items are the most relevant and/or the most amplified. Click to see details and suggested messages.
Amplifiers:
Independent Australia
independentaustralia.net
Flawed AUKUS pact sinking quickly
The AUKUS agreement, aiming to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines, is plagued by delays and mismanagement, benefiting US and UK military-industrial complexes more than Australia. The pact's focus on US interests, fueled by fabricated Australian fears, overlooks Australia's genuine needs, leaving it vulnerable and financially burdened. Experts suggest alternative submarine options, highlighting AUKUS's inherent flaws.
Amplifiers:
Perth Now
perthnow.com.au
US bipartisanship for AUKUS targets 'naysayers'
Despite concerns about US submarine availability and Trump's potential protectionism, bipartisan US congressional support for the AUKUS agreement remains strong. This assures Australia of continued submarine supply and collaboration, countering skepticism about the partnership's future.
Amplifiers:
Australian National Review
australiannationalreview.com
Australian National Review - US Bipartisan Support Will Overcome AUKUS Scepticism: Congressman
Despite concerns about feasibility, U.S. Congressman Joe Courtney assures Australians that AUKUS, a trilateral defense partnership, enjoys strong bipartisan support in Congress. The agreement, countering China's aggression, involves the U.S. and UK arming Australia with nuclear submarines and advanced technologies. Prime Minister Albanese also emphasizes the strong US-Australia relationship and the AUKUS progress.
Amplifiers:
The Age News
theage.com.au
For America, AUKUS is the vehicle to ‘fortify’ Australia against China
AUKUS, a trilateral defense agreement between the US, UK, and Australia, is viewed by US officials as crucial for countering China's influence in the Asia-Pacific. Australia is seen as a key "beachhead" in this effort, and the agreement is believed to concern Chinese President Xi Jinping. Despite concerns about a potential Trump administration shift, US officials remain optimistic about AUKUS's continuation.
Amplifiers:
Brisbane Times
brisbanetimes.com.au
For America, AUKUS is the vehicle to ‘fortify’ Australia against China
AUKUS, a trilateral defense agreement between the US, UK, and Australia, is viewed by US officials as a crucial counter to China's influence in the Asia-Pacific. Australia is considered a key strategic partner, and the agreement is believed to be a concern for Chinese President Xi Jinping. Despite a potential change in US administration, support for AUKUS remains strong.
Amplifiers:
WA Today
watoday.com.au
For America, AUKUS is the vehicle to ‘fortify’ Australia against China
AUKUS, a trilateral defense agreement between Australia, the US, and the UK, is viewed by US officials as crucial for countering China's influence in the Asia-Pacific. Australia is considered a key strategic partner, and the agreement is believed to concern Chinese President Xi Jinping. Despite concerns about a potential shift under a Trump presidency, US officials remain optimistic about AUKUS's continuation.
Amplifiers:
The Sydney Morning Herald
smh.com.au
For America, AUKUS is the vehicle to ‘fortify’ Australia against China
AUKUS, a trilateral defense agreement between Australia, the UK, and the US, is viewed by US officials as crucial for countering China's influence in the Asia-Pacific. Australia is seen as a key "beachhead" in this effort, and the agreement is believed to concern Chinese President Xi Jinping. Despite potential shifts in US administration, support for AUKUS remains strong.
Amplifiers:
South China Morning Post
scmp.com
Aukus, other China-related priorities likely to survive Trump: top US envoy
US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell anticipates significant continuity in Indo-Pacific policy under a potential Trump administration, including maintaining Aukus and technology restrictions targeting China. He expects areas of cooperation despite potential differences in approach.
Amplifiers:
The Straits Times
straitstimes.com
US national security adviser Sullivan says Trump should like 'burden sharing' AUKUS deal
Jake Sullivan stated the AUKUS submarine deal benefits the US through "burden-sharing," aligning with Trump's past rhetoric. The $245 billion project enhances US deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, with Australia investing in US shipyards and contributing to the US submarine industrial base. This collaboration ensures submarine supply for Australia and strengthens the US's regional presence.
Amplifiers:
The Frontier Post Pakistan
thefrontierpost.com
US national security adviser Sullivan says Trump should like ‘burden sharing’ AUKUS deal
US National Security Advisor Sullivan touted the AUKUS submarine deal as beneficial "burden-sharing," aligning with Trump's rhetoric. The $245 billion project enhances US deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, with Australia investing in US shipyards and contributing to the US submarine industrial base. The deal's durability under a Trump presidency is expected.
Read more...
Read Less...

Themes

Tap or click for details
These adjacent themes are currently being amplified along with the main narrative. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Leadership dynamics in Canberra
Albanese and Dutton navigate political waters in Canberra, considering candidates for vice-regal post and managing the Voice referendum respectfully.
Trilateral security partnership to equip Australia with nuclear-powered submarines
Chen criticizes Australia and Japan for exploiting military collaboration
Biden's Foreign Policy Legacy
Biden claims his foreign policy has strengthened the US ahead of Trump's presidency.
Australia's diplomatic ties with the U.S.
In a significant diplomatic gesture, Senator Penny Wong will attend U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration, marking a historic moment for Australia's foreign relations.
Impact of tariffs on U.S. economy and trade with China
Trump believes tariffs have benefited the U.S. economy and led to a significant trade agreement with China.
Australia's Nuclear Waste Dilemma
Australia faces significant challenges in managing nuclear waste from the AUKUS program, as it lacks experience and has banned nuclear power.
Read more...
Read Less...

Entities

Tap or click for details
These entities are mentioned most frequently in the narratives highlighted in this brief. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Technologies
Nuclear Submarines
Advanced submarines to be supplied to Australia under AUKUS.
Advanced Military Technologies
Technologies involved in the AUKUS agreement.
Defense Technologies
Technologies developed and shared under the AUKUS pact.
Submarine Industrial Base
Infrastructure supporting submarine production in the US.
Military Collaboration Technologies
Technologies facilitating collaboration between US and Australian forces.
Organizations
US Congress
Legislative body showing bipartisan support for AUKUS.
Australian Government
Government overseeing the AUKUS agreement and its implications.
UK Government
Partner in the AUKUS agreement alongside the US and Australia.
Indo-Pacific Command
US military command focused on the Indo-Pacific region.
NATO
Potentially relevant organization in the context of global defense.
Companies
US Military-Industrial Complex
Industries benefiting from defense contracts related to AUKUS.
Australian Shipyards
Facilities involved in the AUKUS submarine project.
US Shipyards
Facilities where Australia is investing for submarine construction.
Defense Contractors
Companies involved in the production of military technology under AUKUS.
Nuclear Submarine Manufacturers
Companies that will supply nuclear submarines to Australia.
Events
AUKUS Agreement
Trilateral defense pact between Australia, the US, and the UK.
Indo-Pacific Policy Continuity
Expectation of continued US policy in the Indo-Pacific region.
Submarine Supply Collaboration
Ongoing collaboration between the US and Australia for submarine supply.
Bipartisan Support for AUKUS
Strong bipartisan support in the US Congress for the AUKUS agreement.
China's Aggression
Concerns regarding China's influence in the Asia-Pacific.
People
Joe Courtney
U.S. Congressman who supports the AUKUS agreement.
Kurt Campbell
US Deputy Secretary of State anticipating continuity in Indo-Pacific policy.
Jake Sullivan
US National Security Advisor who discussed the benefits of the AUKUS deal.
Anthony Albanese
Prime Minister of Australia emphasizing the US-Australia relationship.
Xi Jinping
President of China, concerned about the AUKUS agreement.
Technologies
Nuclear Submarines
Advanced submarines to be supplied to Australia under AUKUS.
Advanced Military Technologies
Technologies involved in the AUKUS agreement.
Defense Technologies
Technologies developed and shared under the AUKUS pact.
Submarine Industrial Base
Infrastructure supporting submarine production in the US.
Military Collaboration Technologies
Technologies facilitating collaboration between US and Australian forces.
Organizations
US Congress
Legislative body showing bipartisan support for AUKUS.
Australian Government
Government overseeing the AUKUS agreement and its implications.
UK Government
Partner in the AUKUS agreement alongside the US and Australia.
Indo-Pacific Command
US military command focused on the Indo-Pacific region.
NATO
Potentially relevant organization in the context of global defense.
Companies
US Military-Industrial Complex
Industries benefiting from defense contracts related to AUKUS.
Australian Shipyards
Facilities involved in the AUKUS submarine project.
US Shipyards
Facilities where Australia is investing for submarine construction.
Defense Contractors
Companies involved in the production of military technology under AUKUS.
Nuclear Submarine Manufacturers
Companies that will supply nuclear submarines to Australia.
Events
AUKUS Agreement
Trilateral defense pact between Australia, the US, and the UK.
Indo-Pacific Policy Continuity
Expectation of continued US policy in the Indo-Pacific region.
Submarine Supply Collaboration
Ongoing collaboration between the US and Australia for submarine supply.
Bipartisan Support for AUKUS
Strong bipartisan support in the US Congress for the AUKUS agreement.
China's Aggression
Concerns regarding China's influence in the Asia-Pacific.
People
Joe Courtney
U.S. Congressman who supports the AUKUS agreement.
Kurt Campbell
US Deputy Secretary of State anticipating continuity in Indo-Pacific policy.
Jake Sullivan
US National Security Advisor who discussed the benefits of the AUKUS deal.
Anthony Albanese
Prime Minister of Australia emphasizing the US-Australia relationship.
Xi Jinping
President of China, concerned about the AUKUS agreement.

Context

The AUKUS agreement, a trilateral defense pact between Australia, the US, and the UK, is primarily aimed at countering China's growing influence in the Asia-Pacific region. This partnership is significant given Australia's strategic location and its demographic profile, which includes a diverse population with a strong emphasis on national security. The agreement involves Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarines, a move that raises concerns about financial burdens and operational delays, potentially benefiting the military-industrial complexes of the US and UK more than Australia itself.

Economically, the $245 billion investment in submarines and related technologies is substantial, and while it promises to enhance Australia's defense capabilities, it also diverts resources from other pressing domestic needs. Politically, bipartisan support in the US Congress for AUKUS suggests a commitment to the agreement, despite concerns about future US administrations and their foreign policy directions. This political stability is crucial for Australia, which relies on the US for security assurances.

Geographically, Australia is positioned as a key "beachhead" in the Indo-Pacific, making it a focal point for US military strategy against China. This geopolitical context underscores the importance of AUKUS in maintaining regional stability. However, the reliance on US technology and military support raises questions about Australia's autonomy in defense matters.

In terms of national security, the AUKUS agreement is seen as a necessary response to perceived threats from China, but it also highlights the complexities of international alliances and the potential for mismanagement. Experts suggest that alternative submarine options could better serve Australia's needs, indicating inherent flaws in the current agreement. Overall, while AUKUS aims to bolster Australia's defense posture, it also presents significant challenges that must be navigated carefully.
Read more...
Read Less...