U.S. Media
•7 days
19 sources in U.S. Media are amplifying 25 narrative items relating to the narrative of President Biden's last-minute pardons. These narratives explore themes of potential corruption and abuse of power, particularly concerning pardons for family members and political allies, raising questions about the integrity of the presidential pardon process.
Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that LifeZette portrays the investigation into President Biden's last-minute pardons in a negative light, suggesting corruption and misuse of power. The language used is charged, employing terms such as "last-minute pardons" to imply urgency and wrongdoing, and "ABUSE of power" which evokes a strong emotional response. There are elements of loaded language, framed to create outrage among readers, particularly in references to the pardons granted to his son Hunter and brother James, which suggests nepotism. This coverage shows a bias against Biden, drawing on sensationalism to engage the audience and intensify criticism. In contrast, other outlets may adopt a more neutral approach, focusing on legal implications and the need for transparency without the same level of charged rhetoric, highlighting how LifeZette's narrative differs significantly in its tone and intention. Such choices shape the audience's perception of the seriousness of the allegations, inviting readers to question the integrity of the pardons and the motivations behind them.
The U.S. Media module tracks a broad range of American media sources, including major television, cable, print, and online organizations.