Armed Conflicts

Think Tanks

7 days

Summary

sources
133
Narrative Items
639
Bottom Line Up Front

133 sources in Think Tanks are amplifying 639 narrative items relating to the narrative that domestic terrorism will surpass international threats by 2025. This shift emphasizes the need for US policymakers to focus on internal security challenges, as the containment of Middle Eastern threats allows for a reevaluation of priorities in national defense strategies.

Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that the Center for Strategic & International Studies characterizes domestic terrorism in the U.S. as the greatest threat in 2025, positioning it above traditional international groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS. The language used is assertive, outlining a clear and urgent concern that resonates with policymakers and security professionals. Terms such as "greatest threat" are potent and emphasize the seriousness of the situation, potentially cultivating a sense of fear or urgency among the audience. While the report appears factual, the framing of domestic threats as surpassing those of weakened international groups carries an underlying bias that prioritizes national security concerns, arguably using a propaganda technique aimed at rallying support for enhanced domestic security measures. Compared to other discussions on terrorism that might highlight international collaborations or positive strides in global security, this coverage distinctly emphasizes a domestic focus, thereby contrasting significantly with narratives that might advocate for a more global perspective on safety and threats. Readers may find this portrayal both alarming and critical for understanding upcoming national security priorities.

About This Module

The Think Tanks module tracks a large number of policy institutes, research organizations, and advocacy groups from a wide range of areas such as economics, social issues, military, and science and technology.

Read more...
Read Less...

Geospatial

This map shows narrative amplification activity by sources in this module. Red indicates origin, yellow is destination.
Origin
Destination
The narrative initially emerged from Berlin, headed for Tripoli. As it spread, the most frequent origin shifted to Washington, and the most frequent destination shifted to Washington. There are a total of 27 points of origin, and 57 destinations. Hide details...
28 Mar 2025: Berlin ▸ Tripoli
28 Mar 2025: Islington ▸ Mandalay
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ San Salvador
28 Mar 2025: Holborn ▸ Oxford
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Addis Ababa
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Tallahassee
28 Mar 2025: Stockholm ▸ N’Djamena
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Toronto
28 Mar 2025: Milan ▸ Morocco
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Columbia
28 Mar 2025: Berlin ▸ Budapest
28 Mar 2025: Troy ▸ Kigali
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Tunis
28 Mar 2025: Paris ▸ Paris
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Tehran
28 Mar 2025: Cheltenham ▸ Washington
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Manila
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Moscow
28 Mar 2025: Paris ▸ Brussels
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Cairo
28 Mar 2025: Newark ▸ Lima
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ México
28 Mar 2025: Etterbeek ▸ Kyiv
28 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Beijing
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Berlin
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Baghdad
28 Mar 2025: London ▸ Paris
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Austin
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Washington
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Tbilisi
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Kabul
28 Mar 2025: Bellevue ▸ Stockholm
28 Mar 2025: Chicago ▸ Washington
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ San Diego
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Jerusalem
28 Mar 2025: East Los Angeles ▸ Jackson
28 Mar 2025: Ottawa ▸ Ottawa
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Beijing
28 Mar 2025: London ▸ Beijing
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Tokyo
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Algeria
28 Mar 2025: Newark ▸ Arequipa
28 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Trump
28 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Washington
28 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Gaza
29 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Atlanta
29 Mar 2025: Canberra ▸ Melbourne
29 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Sanaa
29 Mar 2025: Delhi ▸ Kabul
29 Mar 2025: Delhi ▸ Dhaka
29 Mar 2025: Delhi ▸ Kuala Lumpur
29 Mar 2025: Delhi ▸ Tokyo
29 Mar 2025: Delhi ▸ Kuwait City
29 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Manila
29 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Tehran
29 Mar 2025: Troy ▸ Manchester
29 Mar 2025: Winnipeg ▸ Ottawa
29 Mar 2025: Vancouver ▸ Edmonton
29 Mar 2025: Rome ▸ Odesa
29 Mar 2025: London ▸ Kyiv
29 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Washington
29 Mar 2025: Vancouver ▸ Ottawa
29 Mar 2025: Vancouver ▸ Chicago
29 Mar 2025: Vancouver ▸ Toronto
29 Mar 2025: Vancouver ▸ Nanaimo
29 Mar 2025: Vancouver ▸ Calgary
29 Mar 2025: Jerusalem ▸ Jerusalem
29 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Moscow
29 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Chennai
29 Mar 2025: Washington ▸ Manhattan
29 Mar 2025: Hoboken ▸ New York
30 Mar 2025: Stanford ▸ Beijing
30 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Washington
30 Mar 2025: Manhattan ▸ Cairo
30 Mar 2025: Winnipeg ▸ Paris
30 Mar 2025: Islamabad ▸ Islamabad
30 Mar 2025: Canberra ▸ Mekele
31 Mar 2025: Sydney ▸ Canberra

Sources

Sources by Type
Sources of these types represent most of the amplification activity around this narrative
sources by Volume
These sources are amplifying the most items involved in this narrative. Click to see details of each source's narrative activity.
Top sources
Day-by-day volumetric activity of sources amplifying the most items around this narrative
Atlantic Council
5% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Center for European Policy Analysis
4% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Center for Strategic & International Studies
4% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Australian Strategic Policy Institute
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Ludwig von Mises Institute
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Human Rights Watch
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative
2% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Council on Foreign Relations
2% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Brookings Institute
2% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Read more...
Read Less...

Top Items

These narrative items are the most relevant and/or the most amplified. Click to see details and suggested messages.
Read more...
Read Less...

Entities

Tap or click for details
These entities are mentioned most frequently in the narratives highlighted in this brief. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Technologies
Surveillance Technology
Tools used to monitor and prevent terrorist activities.
Data Analytics
Technologies used to analyze data for identifying potential threats.
Organizations
FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation, responsible for investigating domestic terrorism.
Homeland Security
Department responsible for protecting the US from various threats, including terrorism.
People
US Policymakers
Individuals responsible for making decisions and policies in the United States.
Security Professionals
Experts in the field of security, including law enforcement and intelligence.
Companies
Security Firms
Companies that provide security services and solutions to protect against threats.
Events
Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment 2025
An evaluation of the risks posed by domestic terrorism in the United States.
Technologies
Surveillance Technology
Tools used to monitor and prevent terrorist activities.
Data Analytics
Technologies used to analyze data for identifying potential threats.
Organizations
FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation, responsible for investigating domestic terrorism.
Homeland Security
Department responsible for protecting the US from various threats, including terrorism.
People
US Policymakers
Individuals responsible for making decisions and policies in the United States.
Security Professionals
Experts in the field of security, including law enforcement and intelligence.
Companies
Security Firms
Companies that provide security services and solutions to protect against threats.
Events
Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment 2025
An evaluation of the risks posed by domestic terrorism in the United States.

Context

In 2025, domestic terrorism is projected to be the most significant threat to the United States, surpassing the risks posed by weakened international terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. This shift reflects changing demographics and social dynamics within the country, where polarization and radicalization have increased among various groups. Factors such as economic inequality, political discontent, and social media's role in spreading extremist ideologies contribute to the rise of domestic threats.

Geographically, the U.S. is vast and diverse, with urban areas often experiencing higher rates of radicalization due to socioeconomic challenges. Rural areas may also see the emergence of extremist groups, driven by a sense of disenfranchisement. The political landscape is marked by deep divisions, which can exacerbate tensions and lead to violence.

From a military and national security perspective, the focus has shifted from international threats to addressing the root causes of domestic extremism. Law enforcement agencies are increasingly tasked with countering homegrown terrorism, which requires a nuanced understanding of local issues and community engagement.

While international threats from groups in Africa remain active, the situation in the Middle East has stabilized, allowing U.S. resources to be redirected towards domestic security. This reassessment of threats emphasizes the need for comprehensive strategies that address the underlying social and economic factors contributing to domestic terrorism, ensuring that policymakers prioritize both prevention and response measures effectively.
Read more...
Read Less...
World Events
Tap or roll over dots to see representative headlines
Stock & Crypto Dynamics