Armed Conflicts

Think Tanks

7 days

Summary

sources
130
Narrative Items
567
Bottom Line Up Front

130 sources in Think Tanks are amplifying 567 narrative items relating to the narrative that despite BRN insurgents pledging to stop targeting civilians, attacks persist, harming Buddhists and Muslims alike. Human Rights Watch condemns these war crimes, while highlighting how abuses by Thai authorities perpetuate violence and impunity, linking both sides to ongoing conflict.

Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that Human Rights Watch portrays the events in a negative light, emphasizing the continuation of violence by the Barisan Revolusi Nasional despite their pledge to stop targeting civilians. The language used is emotionally charged and condemnatory, with terms like "war crimes," "killings," and "impunity" highlighting the severity and moral gravity of the situation. The source clearly exhibits a critical bias against both the insurgents and Thai authorities, framing both parties as responsible for perpetuating the violence, though with a stronger emphasis on the BRN’s betrayal of commitments. Since only Human Rights Watch is provided as a source, the coverage is singularly focused on human rights violations rather than political or security perspectives, which might be found in other media outlets. This framing would be particularly important for audiences concerned with humanitarian issues and accountability in conflict zones.

About This Module

The Think Tanks module tracks a large number of policy institutes, research organizations, and advocacy groups from a wide range of areas such as economics, social issues, military, and science and technology.

View More
View Less

Geospatial

This map shows narrative amplification activity by sources in this module. Red indicates origin, yellow is destination.
Origin
Destination
The narrative initially emerged from London, headed for Washington. As it spread, the most frequent origin shifted to Washington, with Washington remaining the primary destination. There are a total of 21 points of origin, and 55 destinations. Hide details...
30 May 2025: London ▸ Washington
30 May 2025: Manhattan ▸ Doha
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Kyiv
30 May 2025: Troy ▸ Jamestown
30 May 2025: Etterbeek ▸ Brussels
30 May 2025: London ▸ Baghdad
30 May 2025: Delhi ▸ Tokyo
30 May 2025: New Delhi ▸ New Delhi
30 May 2025: Berlin ▸ Ankara
30 May 2025: Holborn ▸ Washington
30 May 2025: London ▸ Beijing
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Moscow
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Washington
30 May 2025: Manhattan ▸ Beijing
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Beijing
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Yaoundé
30 May 2025: Walnut Creek ▸ Dhaka
30 May 2025: Berlin ▸ Tripoli
30 May 2025: Rome ▸ Astana
30 May 2025: London ▸ London
30 May 2025: London ▸ Kyiv
30 May 2025: Manhattan ▸ Istanbul
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Ottawa
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Jerusalem
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Kinshasa
30 May 2025: Stockholm ▸ Port-au-Prince
30 May 2025: Chicago ▸ Richmond
30 May 2025: Hoboken ▸ Washington
30 May 2025: Islington ▸ Belgrade
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Vilnius
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Singapore
30 May 2025: Manhattan ▸ Washington
30 May 2025: Manhattan ▸ Mexico City
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Syria
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Berlin
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Seoul
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Damascus
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Tehran
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Brazil
30 May 2025: Delhi ▸ Luanda
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Riyadh
30 May 2025: Delhi ▸ Damascus
30 May 2025: Delhi ▸ New Delhi
30 May 2025: Walnut Creek ▸ Toronto
30 May 2025: Weehawken ▸ Washington
30 May 2025: Delhi ▸ Tel Aviv-Yafo
30 May 2025: Delhi ▸ Jammu
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Maputo
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Caracas
30 May 2025: Ottawa ▸ Ottawa
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Taipei
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Paris
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Africa
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Helsinki
30 May 2025: Calgary ▸ Calgary
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Pittsburgh
30 May 2025: Washington ▸ Istanbul
30 May 2025: Canberra ▸ Canberra
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ Tehran
31 May 2025: Stanford ▸ America
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ Beijing
31 May 2025: Troy ▸ Delray Beach
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ Jakarta
31 May 2025: London ▸ Gaza
31 May 2025: Islamabad ▸ Mumbai
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ Kyiv
31 May 2025: Manhattan ▸ New Delhi
31 May 2025: London ▸ Beijing
31 May 2025: Troy ▸ Birmingham
31 May 2025: Troy ▸ Richmond
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ Moscow
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ San Francisco
31 May 2025: Delhi ▸ Delhi
31 May 2025: Washington ▸ Zaporizhzhia

Sources

Sources by Type
Sources of these types represent most of the amplification activity around this narrative
sources by Volume
These sources are amplifying the most items involved in this narrative. Click to see details of each source's narrative activity.
Top sources
Day-by-day volumetric activity of sources amplifying the most items around this narrative
Atlantic Council
7% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Center for Strategic & International Studies
5% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Ludwig von Mises Institute
5% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Observer Research Foundation
4% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Hoover Institution
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Australian Strategic Policy Institute
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Institute for the Study of War
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Lowy Institute for International Policy
3% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Council on Foreign Relations
2% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Royal United Services Institute
2% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
View More
View Less

Top Items

These narrative items are the most relevant and/or the most amplified. Click to see details and suggested messages.
View More

Entities

Tap or click for details
These entities are mentioned most frequently in the narratives highlighted in this brief. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Organizations
Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN)
An insurgent group in southern Thailand involved in attacks against civilians.
Human Rights Watch
An international non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on human rights.
Thai authorities
Government and security forces in Thailand involved in the conflict in the south.
Events
BRN attacks in southern Thailand
Continued violent attacks by the Barisan Revolusi Nasional insurgents targeting civilians despite pledges to cease such actions.
Organizations
Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN)
An insurgent group in southern Thailand involved in attacks against civilians.
Human Rights Watch
An international non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on human rights.
Thai authorities
Government and security forces in Thailand involved in the conflict in the south.
Events
BRN attacks in southern Thailand
Continued violent attacks by the Barisan Revolusi Nasional insurgents targeting civilians despite pledges to cease such actions.

Context

Thailand's southern insurgency is rooted in complex historical, ethnic, and religious tensions. The region, primarily the provinces of Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat, is predominantly Malay-Muslim, contrasting with the largely Buddhist Thai majority. This demographic divide fuels grievances related to cultural and religious identity, economic marginalization, and political representation. The Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN), a separatist group, seeks greater autonomy or independence for the Malay-Muslim population and has engaged in violent attacks targeting both civilians and security forces.

The ongoing violence disrupts social cohesion and economic development in the south, an area already less developed than the rest of Thailand. The conflict hampers investment, tourism, and infrastructure growth, perpetuating poverty and unemployment, which can further fuel insurgency recruitment. The Thai government has deployed significant military and police forces to the region, but allegations of human rights abuses by security personnel, including extrajudicial killings and torture, exacerbate local resentment and undermine trust in state institutions.

Politically, the insurgency challenges Thailand’s national unity and tests the government's ability to balance security measures with respect for human rights. The cycle of violence and impunity complicates peace efforts, as both sides accuse each other of violations. Thailand’s geography, with porous borders near Malaysia, facilitates insurgent movement and complicates counterinsurgency operations.

National security concerns extend beyond the immediate region, as instability in southern Thailand could affect broader regional security and economic stability. The government faces the challenge of addressing legitimate grievances through dialogue and development while maintaining law and order. Without progress on political inclusion and human rights, the conflict risks prolonged violence and further destabilization.
View More
View Less
World Events
Tap or roll over dots to see representative headlines
Stock & Crypto Dynamics