Fox-Dominion Defamation Lawsuit

U.S. Media

•

14 days

Summary

sources
10
Narrative Items
11
Bottom Line Up Front

10 sources in U.S. Media are amplifying 11 narrative items relating to the narrative of Smartmatic's defamation lawsuit against Fox News. The themes of misinformation, media responsibility, and legal accountability intertwine, highlighting the tension between free speech and the consequences of spreading false claims, particularly in the context of election integrity.

Reviewing a number of the most relevant narrative items indicates that Deadline Hollywood presents the ongoing legal battle between Smartmatic and Fox News with a focus on the gravity of the allegations and the potential implications for media credibility. In this portrayal, the lawsuit is characterized as a serious challenge to journalistic integrity, emphasizing Smartmatic's claims of Fox's knowing dissemination of false information. The language used in the piece leans towards the emotional, utilizing terms like “defamation” and “actual malice” to underscore the stakes involved in the case. While the tone does not overtly display bias, there is an evident concern about the impact of misinformation on public trust in the media. Comparatively, while Deadline Hollywood adopts a critical perspective of Fox's actions, it frames the story around the broader implications for free speech and accountability, avoiding hyperbole and focusing on factual developments. The approach reflects a nuanced understanding of the legal complexities, appealing to readers interested in the intersection of law, media ethics, and public trust.

About This Module

The U.S. Media module tracks a broad range of American media sources, including major television, cable, print, and online organizations.

View More
View Less

Sources

Sources by Type
Sources of these types represent most of the amplification activity around this narrative
sources by Volume
These sources are amplifying the most items involved in this narrative. Click to see details of each source's narrative activity.
Top sources
Day-by-day volumetric activity of sources amplifying the most items around this narrative
ArcaMax
18% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
New York Post
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
New York Daily News
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
NewzJunky
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
AlterNet
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Raw Story
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Baptist News Global
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
Deadline Hollywood
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
The Wrap
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
The Bulwark
9% of the items in this brief were amplified by this source.
View More
View Less

Top Items

These narrative items are the most relevant and/or the most amplified. Click to see details and suggested messages.
Amplifiers:
Deadline Hollywood
deadline.com
Fox And Smartmatic Seek Summary Judgments In Latest Filings In Defamation Case
Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News, alleging Fox amplified false claims of election rigging, is before a New York judge. Both parties seek summary judgment. Smartmatic claims Fox knowingly spread false information, while Fox argues its coverage was protected and Smartmatic's claims are exaggerated and its reputation already damaged. The outcome hinges on proving "actual malice."
Amplifiers:
The Wrap
thewrap.com
Fox and Smartmatic Separately Seek Summary Judgments in $2.7 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Fraud
Fox News and Smartmatic both seek summary judgments in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit stemming from 2020 election fraud claims. Fox argues Smartmatic was a failing business, unlike Dominion, with whom Fox settled for $787 million. A judge will decide if a full trial is necessary.
Amplifiers:
Baptist News Global
baptistnews.com
Newsmax election defamation case to begin jury trial today
Newsmax's trial for Dominion Voting Systems' $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit begins. Dominion alleges Newsmax knowingly spread false claims about election fraud. This follows Fox News's $787.5 million settlement with Dominion and highlights numerous lawsuits against conservative media figures who promoted false 2020 election narratives.
Amplifiers:
ArcaMax
arcamax.com
ks-Fox News says Smartmatic was not harmed by its 2020 election reporting
Fox News is seeking summary judgment in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit, arguing its 2020 election coverage, though featuring false claims about Smartmatic, didn't harm the company. Smartmatic counters that Fox News' actions caused job losses and billions in damages, while Fox News points to Smartmatic's pre-existing reputation and other legal issues.
Amplifiers:
Raw Story
rawstory.com
'You will be hunted': Voting machine company reveals new death threats from Fox viewers
Smartmatic, a voting machine company, revealed new death threats against its employees in its $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News. The threats followed Fox's allegedly false claims about Smartmatic's machines rigging the 2020 election, causing reputational damage and layoffs. Smartmatic aims to win a full judgment, unlike Dominion Voting Systems' $787 million settlement with Fox.
Amplifiers:
AlterNet
alternet.org
'You will be hunted': Voting machine company reveals new death threats from Fox viewers
Smartmatic, a voting machine company, revealed new death threats from Fox News viewers in its ongoing $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit. The threats followed Fox's allegedly false claims about Smartmatic's machines rigging the 2020 election, causing reputational damage and layoffs. Smartmatic aims to win the full amount, unlike Dominion Voting Systems, which settled for $787 million.
Amplifiers:
New York Post
nypost.com
Fox News claims Smartmatic is ‘failing business’ looking for ‘litigation lottery ticket’: court docs
Fox News is seeking dismissal of Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit, arguing Smartmatic is a failing business using the lawsuit as a "lottery ticket." Fox contends Smartmatic's claims are unsubstantiated and dissimilar to the Dominion case, citing Smartmatic's financial struggles, past controversies, and weak evidence of damages. Smartmatic denies these claims, asserting Fox knowingly spread false information.
Amplifiers:
ArcaMax
arcamax.com
Kari Lake to let One America News Network handle programming for Voice of America
Kari Lake, a Trump appointee, partnered with the controversial One America News Network (OAN) to provide VOA news programming, claiming it saves taxpayer money. This decision raises concerns given OAN's history of spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories, particularly regarding the 2020 election.
Amplifiers:
New York Daily News
nydailynews.com
Kari Lake to let One America News Network program Voice of America
Kari Lake, a Trump advisor, arranged for the conspiracy-prone One America News Network (OAN) to provide free news programming to Voice of America (VOA). This decision, despite VOA's history of countering propaganda, has raised concerns due to OAN's past promotion of election falsehoods and its lawsuits for defamation. Lake claims the deal saves taxpayer money.
Amplifiers:
NewzJunky
dailymail.co.uk
Inside MyPillow's Mike Lindell's very personal plea to Trump during secret White House meeting
Mike Lindell met with Trump to discuss two issues: a complex COVID-era tax problem affecting small businesses and the imprisonment of Colorado election clerk Tina Peters. Lindell, while personally resolved, sought a broader tax fix. He also advocated for Peters' release, despite her conviction for election data breach.
View More

Entities

Tap or click for details
These entities are mentioned most frequently in the narratives highlighted in this brief. Click to see details of narrative activity related to each one.
Companies
Smartmatic
A company involved in providing election technology.
Fox News
A major news organization in the United States.
Events
Defamation Lawsuit
A legal case where Smartmatic is suing Fox News for defamation.
Summary Judgment Hearing
A court proceeding where both parties seek a ruling without a full trial.
People
Smartmatic
A technology company specializing in election systems and services.
Fox News
An American multinational conservative cable news television channel.
Technologies
Election Technology
Systems and services used to conduct elections.
Organizations
New York Court
The judicial body where the lawsuit is being heard.
Companies
Smartmatic
A company involved in providing election technology.
Fox News
A major news organization in the United States.
Events
Defamation Lawsuit
A legal case where Smartmatic is suing Fox News for defamation.
Summary Judgment Hearing
A court proceeding where both parties seek a ruling without a full trial.
People
Smartmatic
A technology company specializing in election systems and services.
Fox News
An American multinational conservative cable news television channel.
Technologies
Election Technology
Systems and services used to conduct elections.
Organizations
New York Court
The judicial body where the lawsuit is being heard.

Context

The defamation lawsuit between Smartmatic and Fox News highlights significant issues surrounding media integrity, public trust, and the political landscape in the United States. Smartmatic, a technology company involved in election systems, alleges that Fox News disseminated false claims regarding election rigging, which could have far-reaching implications for democracy and electoral processes. The case underscores the critical role of media in shaping public perception and the potential consequences of misinformation, particularly in a politically charged environment.

Demographically, the U.S. is increasingly polarized, with differing views on election integrity often aligning with political affiliations. This polarization can exacerbate tensions and complicate the legal landscape surrounding media coverage and accountability. Economically, the stakes are high; a ruling against Fox could set a precedent affecting how media outlets report on sensitive topics, potentially leading to financial repercussions for news organizations.

From a political perspective, the case reflects broader concerns about the influence of media on public opinion and the integrity of democratic institutions. The concept of "actual malice" is central to defamation law, requiring proof that the defendant acted with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, which is a high bar to meet.

Geographically, the case is situated in New York, a hub for media and legal proceedings, which may influence the case's visibility and impact. National security considerations also come into play, as misinformation can undermine public confidence in electoral systems, potentially leading to civil unrest or challenges to governance. The outcome of this lawsuit could have lasting implications for media practices, public trust, and the health of democracy in the U.S.
View More
View Less
World Events
Tap or roll over dots to see representative headlines
Stock & Crypto Dynamics